APHC010132232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5788/2019 Between: 1. YADAVALLI DHANALAKSHMI, W/O.SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 32 YRS, H.NO.8-57, PADAMATI VEEDHI, KAIKARAM VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.ELURU. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UNGUTURU MANDAL. GANAPAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHEBROLE POLICE STATION, CHEBROLE. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. DONADI DURGA, W/O.LATE SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 30 YRS, R/O.PADAMATI VEEDHI, KAIKARAM VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. YADAVALLI VENKATA RAO, S/O.RANGA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 28 YRS, R/O.PADAMATI VEEDHI, KAIKARAM VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 7. YADAVALLI RANGA RAO, S/O.RAMANNA, HINDU, MALE, AGED 60 YRS, R/O.PADAMATI VEEDHI, KAIKARAM (V), UNGUTURU (M), W.G.DT., 8. YADAVALLI VEERAMMA, W/O.RANGA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 55 YRS, R/O.PADAMATI VEEDHI, KAIKARAM VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto declare the inaction of the respondent nos. 2 to 4 in not registering the FIR in pursuance of the petitioner's complaint, dt.12-12-2018 against unofficial respondent nos. 5 to 8 2 under Secs.354, 323, 448 AND 506 (2) IPC., is quite illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondent nos.2 to 4 to register the FIR in pursuance of the ccmplaint, dt.12-12-2018 made by the petitioner against the unofficial respondent nos.5 to 8 under Secs.354, 323, 448 & 506 (2) IPC., pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5788 of 2019 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption 8For Dismissal9. Even on earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 4, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 7th January, 2026 cbn 4 37 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5788 of 2019 7th January, 2026 cbn