1 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.965 OF 2010) APHC010133092010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 965/2010 Between: 1. S. IMMANUEL BABU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT & ANO, S/O. LATE S. JOHN SUNDARAM, R/O. 1/127, KLM HOSPITAL, JEEVAGRAM, RENIGUNTA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. KUMARI R. CHETANA,, D/O. LATE DORATHI FLORENCE, R/O. 1/127, KLM HOSPITAL, JEEVAGRAM, RENIGUNTA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. VULASA CHENCHU RAMAIAH CHITTOOR DISTRICT, S/o. Venkataswamy, R/o. 12-120/B, Nakka harijanawada, Srikalahasthi Town and Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 2317 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant temporary injunction restraining the respondent herein with from withdrawing the death benefits of Smt. Dorathi Florance from the department of Medical and Health, Chittoor, Govt. of A.P. the subject matter of S.O.P. No. 2 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.965 OF 2010) 27 of 2008, on the file of the court of the III Addl.District Judge, Tirupathi, pending disposal of the above appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. YELLAPRAGADA SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.965 OF 2010) JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellants/petitioners, being aggrieved from the dismissal of their petition filed under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act,1925 seeking issuance of a succession certificate in their favour, by order and decree dated 30.08.2010 passed in S.O.P.No.27 of 2008 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Tirupati. 2. Sri O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that the petitioners are the elder brother and daughter of the sister of the deceased Dorathi Flarence. 3. There is no representation for the appellants. 4. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :16.02.2026. RPD. 4 (RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.965 OF 2010) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 965 OF 2010 Date: 16.02.2026 RPD.