DANNA SHAHA MIYAN URS MELA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/17668/2026 · 2026-05-05
Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17668 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. May 6, 2026 NS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Jitendra Bahadur Singh, Rajiv Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Danna Shaha Miyan Urs Mela Management Committee .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad