KIIHAA FOODS AND HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15630/2025 · 2026-01-19
Maneesh Sharma
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19045 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19045 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2156] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15630/2025 KIIHAA Foods And Hospitality Private Limited, Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Nitesh Agarwal Having Its Registered Office At 246, Gayatri Nagar-A, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302018 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Excise Department, Through The Commissioner Having Its Office At 2, Gumaniwala, Panchawati, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
3. District Excise Officer, Jaipur City, Jyothi Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16389/2025 Manish Agarwal S/o Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 246, Gayatri Nagar-A, Maharani Farm, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Excise Department, Through The Commissioner Having Its Office At 2, Gumaniwala, Panchawati, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
3. District Excise Officer, Jaipur City, Jyothi Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajatshatru Meena (SBCWP 15630/2025) Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman (SBCWP 16389/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Saurabh Sharma
[2026:RJ-JP:2156] (2 of 3) [CW-15630/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 19/01/2026
1. During the course of hearing of the present writ petitions, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that a proposal for the settlement of dues was given by the petitioner- Manish Agarwal, to the respondents vide settlement proposal dated 22.12.2025, and learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that the said proposal has been conditionally accepted by the State, subject to the encashment of cheques and fulfillment of the conditions encapsulated therein. He further submits that in view of the same, he has no qualms if the impugned attachment
order dated 01.10.2025 is quashed and set aside, subject to strict adherence to the terms and conditions of the said settlement proposal dated 22.12.2025 by the petitioner-Manish Agarwal.
2. Learned counsels for the petitioner-Manish Agarwal submits that the petitioner undertakes to comply with the terms of settlement and further undertakes that all the Post Dated Cheques will be duly encashed on due dates, and will not be dishonoured.
3. Heard
4. In view of the above consensus arrived at between the parties and conditional acceptance of the settlement proposal dated 22.12.2025, this Court deems it appropriate to quash and set aside the impugned attachment order dated 01.10.2025.
5. In that view of the matter, since the cause of action does not survive, both the present writ petitions have become infructuous.
6. However, it is made clear that in case there is a default of payment/violation of any terms of the settlement proposal dated
[2026:RJ-JP:2156] (3 of 3) [CW-15630/2025] 22.12.2025 by the petitioner-Manish Agarwal; the respondent shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate legal proceedings in this behalf, including, moving an appropriate application for revival of these writ petitions or initiating fresh proceedings against the present petitioners or reviving the impugned attachment order dated 01.10.2025.
7. With the aforesaid directions and liberty, the present writ petitions are disposed of.
8. All other pending application(s), shall also stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /22-23