2026:JHHC:19866 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6240 of 2026 Md. Ansur Ansari, Son of Suddin Mian @ Samsudin Miyan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Imran Ansari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Fahad Alam, Advocate --- 03/7th July 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2024 for the offence registered under Section 302/34 of IPC, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Giridih in S.T. No. 304/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 12.11.2025 in B.A. No. 7827/2025 and the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on account of custody of the petitioner since 23.03.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on merits earlier and the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. The learned counsel submits that out of 13 charge-sheet witnesses, 9 have been examined as is apparent from paragraph 17 of the bail application. 4. To which, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the last witness in the case was examined on 19.02.2026 and thereafter no witness has been produced. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is serious allegation made against the petitioner, who is said to have murdered his sister-in-law in matrimonial home, this Court is not 2026:JHHC:19866 2 inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected. 6. However, there can be no excuse on the part of the State not to produce the remaining witnesses before the learned Court. 7. The records also reveal that the sample was sent for forensic examination. 8. The State is directed to ensure that the remaining witnesses are promptly produced and the report from FSL is also produced before the concerned court. 9. Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Director, Prosecution as well as Superintendent of Police of the concerned district and also to SFSL Ranchi to ensure compliance. 10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.07.2026 Uploaded On: 07.07.2026 Mukul/-