[2026:RJ-JP:817] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16342/2023 1. Chagan Lal Verma S/o Sohan Lal Verma, (Died During Pendency Of The Appeal) 1/1. Gaurav Verma S/o Late Shri Chagan Lal Verma, Proprietor Verma Photo Studio, Outside Mathura Gate, Opposite Panch Mukhi Hanuman Temple, Bharatpur At Present Resident Of Plot No. 73, Swarn Jayanti Nagar Scheme, Uit, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners/Non-Applicant Versus 1. Smt. Usha Garg W/o Late Shri Anand Prakash Garg, W/o Late Shri Anand Prakash Garg, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of 58-B, Sukh Vihar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Devesh Garg S/o Late Shri Anand Prakash Garg, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of 58-B, Sukh Vihar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Neha Garg D/o Late Shri Anand Prakash Garg, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of 58-B, Sukh Vihar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Aashish Garg S/o Late Shri Anand Prakash Garg, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of 58-B, Sukh Vihar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Inder Prakash Garg S/o Late Shri Satyakam Garg, (Died During Pendency Of Appeal) 6. Abhey Garg S/o Late Shri Inder Prakash Garg, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Outside Mathuragate, Opposite Panch Mukhi Hanuman Temple, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents-Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Daga with Mr. Rahul Chouhan Mr. M.L. Sharma Mr. Pankaj Soni Mr. Aanjanaiy Sharma Mr. Anuj Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampati Sharma [2026:RJ-JP:817] (2 of 2) [CW-16342/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 09/01/2026 1. With the consent of both the parties, the present civil misc. appeal is disposed of in the following terms: (i) The application filed by the respondents under Section 19(9) of the Rent Control Act, 2001 is dismissed as not pressed by learned counsel for the respondents. (ii) Learned counsel for the respondents also agrees that he will not lead any further evidence before the learned Rent Tribunal. (iii) Both the parties agree that the learned Rent Tribunal shall decide the rent application afresh, without being influenced by any observations made by the learned Appellate Court in its order dated 27.09.2023. (iii) The learned trial Court is expected to decide the rent application pending before it as expeditiously as possible, taking into consideration the provisions of Section 15(5) of the Rent Control Act, 2001 2. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/30