( 2026:JHHC:19818 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5415 of 2026 ----- Ramrash Singh @ Rajeev Kumar, aged about 28 years, s/o Ramji Sharma, r/o Village-Bahrawa, P.O.-Konang, P.S.-Halsi, Dist.-Lakhisarai, Bihar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate : Mr. Aniket Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Vishal Kr. Binay, Advocate For the State : Ms. Shweta Singh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 06.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Hirodih P.S. Case No.121 of 2025 (G.R. No. 2633 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under sections 61(2)/ 103(1)/238(b)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 11.03.2026 in B.A. No. 11120 of 2025. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons and in criminal conspiracy with them has committed murder of Suresh Kumar Verma. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and the co-accused driver of the deceased went in a Scorpio vehicle hence, suspicion is raised that the petitioner might have committed the murder. It is then submitted that in the meanwhile, one witness namely Rajesh Kumar has been examined and he has not stated anything except that the petitioner and the co-accused went in a Scorpio vehicle with the deceased. It is next submitted that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.09.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Hirodih P.S. Case No.121 of 2025 (G.R. No. 2633 of 2025) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 06.07.2026 Gunjan-