Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19036 (JHR)

MUNNA KACHHAP v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6195/2026 · 2026-07-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19764] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6195 of 2026 ------ Munna Kachhap, aged about 47 years, s/o Sri Jagarnath Kachhap, R/o Jhipakowa, Lower Burdwan Compound, P.O. and P.S. – Lalpur, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1132 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 115(2), 117(2), 127(2), 308(4), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of Madheshvar Singh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the main allegation of assault is upon the sons of the petitioner namely Aniket Kachhap and Aman Kachhap and the only allegation against the petitioner of extorting the co-accused persons along with his wife and of assaulting the mother of the informant and making her fall down. It is also submitted that though the charge sheet has been submitted in this case against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.02.2026 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1132 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 06.07.2026 Saroj/