[2026:RJ-JP:2258] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12476/2025 1. Kadu S/o Likhmi @ Lakhmi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Alipur Police Station Khoh District Deeg. At Present In District Jail, Deeg. 2. Vinesh S/o Likhmi @ Lakhmi, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Alipur Police Station Khoh District Deeg. At Present In District Jail, Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. S.S. Solanki Mr. Ramesh Singh Tanwar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 119/2025 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for offences u/S 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 352, 103(1) & 303(2) of BNS. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers. 3. As per the contents of the FIR, the allegation against the accused petitioner is that he alongwith other co-accused gave beating to the deceased and as a result he died. On perusal of the postmortem report, there are four visible abrasions. The Board, [2026:RJ-JP:2258] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12476/2025] which conducted the postmortem of the deceased, kept reserved the opinion regarding cause of death which was to be given after receiving the FSL report. 4. As per the result of the examination by the Forensic Science Laboratory, there was presence of Ethyl Alcohol. On the basis of the FSL report, the opinion as regards the cause of death was sought by the SHO from the Medical Jurist. The Medical Jurist gave opinion that "Regarding cause of death is after examination of the F.S.L report No. RFSL/BPR/Toxi/Exam/279/2025 on date 17.07.25 FIR No. 119/2025 PMR No. 22/25 on date 11.05.2025 presence of Ethyl Alcohol as per FSL report which is not sufficient to cause death. However, cardiorespiratory arrest could not be ruled out." 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, at this stage, it cannot be said that the beating given by the accused petitioners could be cause of death and it could be ascertained after detailed evidence before the trial Court. The accused petitioners are said to be in custody since 20.08.2025 and after completion of investigation, the police has already submitted charge-sheet. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that they furnish personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of [2026:RJ-JP:2258] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12476/2025] the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /59