Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19035 (CHH)

PARMESHWAR GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4571/2021 · 2026-05-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21785 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate WPS No. 4571 of 2021 Parmeshwar Gupta S/o Lt. Shri Ramvriksh Sav Aged About 64 Years Retired From The Post Of Senior Internal Audit Officer Janpad Panchayat Balarampur, District Balarampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Balrampur, District Balarampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Balrampur, District Balarampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 4 - Accountant General Office Of Account General (A And E) Zero Point Chhattisgarh Raipur. (As Per Honble Court Order Dated- 09-01-2026) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.05.09 15:18:39 +0530 2 ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Petitioner appears through Video Conferencing For Respondent(s) : Shri Atanu Ghosh Dy. Govt Advocate along with Shri Deepraj Kant, CEO Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur (C.G.) AWARD (Passed on 09.05.2026) 1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner sought release of the claimed pensionary benefits alleging inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in not extending the full retiral dues after retirement on 30.04.2019. 2. However, the petitioner, appearing through video conferencing, submitted that the grievance of the petitioner now stands redressed as the admissible benefits have already been released by the department. Therefore, the petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition. 3. In view of the submission so made, the parties have amicably settled the dispute between themselves. 4. The Court also recorded that the contesting parties had amicably settled the dispute and, finding the terms of compromise to be just, proper, and legal, accepted the settlement arrived at between them. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 3 6. A copy of the docket/compromise arrived at between the parties be made part of this award. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Malay Shrivastava) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh shoaib