RAKESH KUMAR DHINGRA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/29394/2026 · 2026-05-22
Sumeet Goel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19034 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19034 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M No.29394 of 2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 *****
CRM-M No.29394 of 2026 Date of decision : 22.5.2026 Date of uploading : 22.5.2026
Rakesh Kumar Dhingra
………….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another
…….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. J.S. Ghumman, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab (on advance copy)
--- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for quashing of FIR No.100 dated 3.6.2025 under Sections 406, 420 IPC and Section 82 of Registration Act, 1908, registered at Police Station Division No.6, District Police Commissionerate, Jalandhar; and all the consequent proceedings qua the petitioner.
2. At the outset, learned State counsel (on instructions from Inspector Rajwant Kaur, SHO, Police Station Division No.6, District Police Commissionerate, Jalandhar), has submitted that the police has prepared the final report under Section 172 of Cr.P.C./challan and the same shall be filed within a period of 3 weeks from today.
3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel appearing for the ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.22 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.29394 of 2026 -2-
petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh after laying challenge to the challan/final report, in case so advised/occasion so arises.
4. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE 22.5.2026 Ashwanii
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.22 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document