Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19028 (RAJ)

ABHISHEK MEENA S/O SHRI AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12820/2025 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:952] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12820/2025 1. Abhishek Meena S/o Shri Amar Singh, R/o Thahariya, Karauli, Rajasthan. 2. Sonu @ Neeraj Meena S/o Ramroop Meena, R/o Dhoolwas, Bukna Dhukna, Karauli, Sapotara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pavan Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor Mr. Ashok Samoda for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.1162/2023 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 365, 384, 341, 323 and 143 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged incident took place at a spur of moment on the issue of celebration of birthday of one of the member of the complainant party. [2026:RJ-JP:952] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12820/2025] 5. Learned counsel further submits that with the motivation of elders, the parties have entered into a compromise. Learned counsel has also placed before this Court a copy of written compromise arrived in between the parties which is taken on record. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant also verify the fact of compromise. 7. Having regard the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners and so also the fact that the accused-petitioners are student and they have settled their dispute and have signed a written compromise, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioners. 8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioners named above in connection with FIR No.1162/2023 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City (East) shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2026:RJ-JP:952] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12820/2025] (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv) In case the petitioners are found to be involved in any criminal case in future, the learned trial Court would be free to cancel the bail bond and sureties without further reference to this Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /259