1 ( 2026:HHC:33843 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO (MV) No. 219 of 2014 Decided on: 12.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Shakeela ....Appellant Versus Sanjay Gupta & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. Amar Deep Singh,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for respondent No. 3/Insurance Company states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in terms of the settlement, respondent No. 3/Insurance Company has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- lac in lump sum, over and above the amount, already awarded by the learned Tribunal below, in full and final settlement of the claim. Learned counsel for the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:33843 ) appellant acknowledged the statement so made by learned counsel for respondent No. 3/Insurance Company. The statements of learned counsel for respondent No. 3/Insurance Company as well as the appellant in this regard have been recorded separately and placed on record. 2. Therefore, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the present appeal is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3/Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- lac in lump sum to the appellant, over and above the amount, already awarded by the learned Tribunal below, in full and final settlement of the claim within a period of 45 days. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 12th August, 2026 Judge (raman)