Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19024 (AP)

Kasula Vinod Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7027/2026 · 2026-03-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010131502026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7027/2026 Between: 1. KASULA VINOD KUMAR,, S/O LATE VENKATA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 18/405, RANGAIAH GARI STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. KASULA RAJESWARI,, W/O KASULA VINOD KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O D.NO. 18/405, RANGAIAH GARI STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 522503 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, RANGE 2, KUMOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH.518001 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KADAPA CITY AND KADAPA DISTRICT 516001 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA CITY, KADAPA DISTRICT 516001 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.K.DINNE POLICE 2 STATION, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , C.K.DINNE POLICE STATION, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT- 516216 8. SUBBARAYUDU, , DOCUMENT WRITER, C/O SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE (RURAL AND URBAN), KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT 516216 9. B SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, S/O NEELAKANTA RAO, D.N0.2/937- 6A, SRI HARI RAO STREET, NAGARAJUPETA, KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICTS 516001 10. YERRAGUNTLA OBUL REDDY, , S/O YERRAGUNTLA NADIPI SUBBA REDDY, D.NO. 1/65, TADIGOTLA VILLAGE, CK DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICTS 216216 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7027 OF 2026 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “ … may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or Direction; a) Directing the official Respondents I to 7 their subordinates and agents to forthwith desist from interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to the Property i.e., the Land in Sy.No.355/1, Ac.6.23 cents Tadigotla Revenue Village, Kopparthi Panchayath, Kadapa District; b) Directing the official Respondents 1 to 7 not to threaten or force the Petitioners to come to the police station for settlement of the civil dispute with the Respondents 8 and 9; c) Directing the Respondents 2 to 5 herein to consider the representation/legal notice dated 14.08.2025 and take appropriate action against the Respondents 6 and 7 for involving in civil disputes which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts and Pass..”. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, without there being any crime registered against the petitioners, the police are calling them to the Police Station. Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioners are aged persons and that it is very difficult for them to attend the Police Station. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have received a complaint from one Mr. Subrahmanyam through the Public Grievances Redressal System addressed to the Superintendent of Police, which was forwarded to the concerned Police Station. The police are conducting a preliminary enquiry in the matter. The complaint, prima facie, 4 discloses a cognizable offence and the matter is under process. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the complaint received against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.03.2026 KNN 5 100 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WP.No.7027 of 2026 Dt.11.03.2026 KNN