[2026:JHHC:19708] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3582 of 2026 Raunak Thakur @ Raunak Kumar Thakur, aged about 21 years, Son of Rakesh Thakur, Resident of Kailash Nagar, Irgu Toli, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 06.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 73 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-XXXI, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the altercation took place on the day of Holi festival. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-10 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of making assault upon the stomach of the informant by way of knife and due to which, grievous injury has been caused. 5. In the FIR, there is direct allegation against the petitioner [2026:JHHC:19708] -2- of making assault upon the informant along with his friends and pursuant to that grievous injury has been caused to the informant. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-06.07.2026 Amitesh/-