Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19021 (JHR)

IDUL ANSARI @ IDUL v. THE STATE OFJHARKHAND

B.A./6238/2026 · 2026-07-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:19792) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6238 of 2026 Idul Ansari @ Idul, aged about 45 years, son of Neyamul Ansari, resident of village – near Choti Mazjid, Madanpur, Kokdoro, PO – Kokdoro, PS – Pithoria, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 06th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 169 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person has committed murder of son of the informant Saqlain Ansari. It is next submitted that the specific allegation is against Afshar Ansari of committing murder of Saqlain Ansari and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner earlier quarrelled with the deceased. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and charge-sheet has been submitted. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 169 of 2022, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 06.07.2026 Aditi