W.P.(C) 13839/2026 $~117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010449972026 + W.P.(C) 13839/2026 & CM APPL. 64780/2026 NARENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Narender Kumar, Mr. Manish Sharam, Advocates for UoI. Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 21.09.2026 1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “(I) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions against the Respondent to decide the representation dated 12.02.2026 submitted by the Petitioner regarding correction/rectification of the Form P7 pertaining to the Kh. 1221(New) measuring 5 Bigha 10 Biswa instead 3 bigha 9 biswa situated in the revenue Estate of Village Mehrauli, New Delhi as per Khatoni recorded in the years 1964-65, 1965-66. 1966-67. 1967-68, 1968-69 as approved by the District Magistrate in relation to correction of revenue record in the year 2014; and (II) Pass any other order or orders as may be just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Issue notice. Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:14:23 W.P.(C) 13839/2026 3. Mr. Joshi submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 12.02.2026 to the respondent authorities seeking correction of the revenue records in respect of Khasra No. 1221, Village Mehrauli. 4. Mr. Joshi further submits that the petitioner’s claim is premised on his assertion that he is the son of Late Shri Chander Bhan, whereas the records reflect that one Satbeer Mehlawat had applied in the year 2015, claiming himself to be the son of Late Shri Chander Bhan, and that the petitioner’s name was not mentioned therein. He further submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner in 2026 is belated. 5. Mr. Daleep Dhyani, learned counsel for the petitioner, disputes these submissions, but states that the respondent may be directed to communicate its decision, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. 6. The writ petition, alongwith the pending application, is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 12.02.2026, and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today. 7. It is made clear that all rights and remedies of the parties are kept open. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 ‘B’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:14:23