[2026:JHHC:19767] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6202 of 2026 ------ Dablu Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Gupta @ Dablu Gupta, aged about 30 years, Son of Santosh Saw, Resident of vill.- Rerma Cowk, Ward No. 26, PO – Daltonganj, P.S.- Town Daltonganj, District- Palamu, Jharkhand - 822101 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, Advocate Mr. Piyush Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 535 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4), of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons committed robbery and looted the earning of the day of the informant from the cash box of his shop at the point of pistol and from the neighbouring shop of the informant also, demanded extortion and extortion amount being not given, destroyed two tray of the eggs by thrashing them in the floor and also looted money from the neighbouring shop; which has been recorded in CCTV camera. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.04.2026 as mentioned in para-7 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that apart from this case, the petitioner is also involved in two other cases and he is a threat to the law and order situation in the locality; hence, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of his absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the bail of the above named petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is rejected at this stage. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 06.07.2026 Saroj/