Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19016 (PNJ)

PANKAJ CHAUHAN AND ORS v. VINAY KUMAR, IRPS

COCP/102/2025 · 2026-05-19

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[214] Pankaj Cha Vinay Kum Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] recommend [2] State within time to act [3] the present [4] [5] disposed of 19.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-102 Date of De aj Chauhan and others versus y Kumar, IRPS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Ad Mr. Nitesh Kaushal, Addl. AG Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, H **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Mr. Kaushal, has produced mendees dated 18.05.2026, which is On the basis thereof, the recom within a period of one week. Thereaf act in accordance with law. In view of the above, no furthe resent contempt petition. Disposed off. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 102-2025 (O&M) of Decision : 19.05.2026 …Petitioners ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. dl. AG, Haryana and G, Haryana. uced copy of the revised result o hich is taken on record. recommendations will be made to th hereafter, the State is granted 08 week further order is required to be passed neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No esult of e to the weeks’ assed in stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:47 I agree to specified portions of this document