Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19016 (CAL)

JUGAL PRADHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/5456/2026 · 2026-03-23

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

7 2233..0033..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 5456 of 2026 Jugal Pradhan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Nirmalendu Bera …for the petitioner Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr. Akash Dutta …for the State 1. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that writ petition is not pressed. 2. However, leave is prayed for on behalf of the petitioner to file afresh with better particulars. 3. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. In view of aforesaid submission writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed but this order shall not preclude the petitioner to file writ petition with better particulars. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)