CRWP-5894-20 IN THE H (108 ) PRAISE MATT STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. **** MANISHA BAT 1. The the Constitution the official respo petitioners at the representation da 2. At t submitted that t 16.05.2026 befor raising their grie has not yet been 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat ATTU AND ANOTHER Versus
F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Pardeep Singh Mirpur, Advocat Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed tution of India seeking issuance of a w l respondents No.2 and 3 to protect at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 tion dated 16.05.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Commissioner of Police, ir grievances as mentioned in the pre been considered and no action has bee AB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-5894-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA
dvocate for the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226/227 of of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the .4 to 6 and to take action on their 5). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on olice, Jalandhar (Annexure P-5) he present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5894-20 further submitted appropriate direc Police, Jalandha petitioners and ta 3. Noti 4. Ms. notice on behalf be done in due c her during the co 5. In v commenting any disposed of at th aforesaid repres within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec
20.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) mitted that at this stage, the petition e directions are issued to responden landhar to decide the aforesaid rep and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ehalf of the respondents-State and su due course. Let a complete set of the the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 16.05.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
  
petitioners would be satisfied if pondent No.2-Commissioner of id representation filed by the nior DAG, Punjab, has advance and submits that the needful will of the paperbook be supplied to made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No
AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.