2026:JHHC:19477 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 322 of 2020 ------ 1. Jago Dusadh, S/o Chhotu Dusadh. 2. Prabil Paswan @ Prabil Dusadh, S/o Chhotu Dusadh. Both resident of Village Sirsi, PO & PS-Katkamdag, at present Dist-Hazaribagh. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Jagdish Ram, S/o Late Ram Charan Ram. 2. Sitwa Devi, W/o Sri Jagdish Ram. Both residents of Village-Sirsi, PO & PS-Katkamdag, at present, District-Hazaribagh. 3. Mutak Ram, S/o Late Ram Charan Ram. 4(a). Sudama Devi, W/o Late Manohar Ram. 4(b). Sundar Ravidas 4(c). Binod Kumar Das 4(d). Rajesh @ Guddan All are sons of late Manohar Ram and R/o Village-Sirsi, PO & PS- Katkamdag, Dist-Hazaribagh. 4(e). Punam Kumari, W/o not known, R/o Village Barkagaon, PO & PS-Barkagaon, Dist-Hazaribagh. 4(f). Arti Kumari, W/o not known, R/o Village-Bishungarh, PO & PS-Bishungarh, Dist-Hazaribagh. 5. Anup Ravidas, S/o Late Ram Charan Das. 6. Nand Kishore Ravidas @ Suman Ravidas, S/o Late Ram Charan Das. No.3 to 6 residents of Village-Sirsi, PO & PS-Katkamdag at present, Dist-Hazaribagh. 7. Shanti Devi, Wife of Chitaman Ram, D/o Late Ram Charan Ram. 8. Rewatia Devi, W/o Bhuneshwar Ram, Daughter of Late Ram Charan Ram. No.7 & 8 village + PO + PS-Katkamdag, Dist-Hazaribagh. 9. Dewanti Devi, W/o Tejan Ram and D/o Late Ram Charan Ram resident of Village-Karimganj, PO & PS-Churchu, Dist- Hazaribagh. 10. Pachal Dusadh, S/o Chhotu Dusadh. 11(a). Anmol Mishra S/o Late Braj Kishore Mishra, R/o Village- Sirsi, PO & PS-Katkamdag, Dist-Hazaribagh. 12. Died issueless. 13. Nagia Devi, W/o Shri Jago Dusadh. Nos. 10 to 13 resident of Village -Sirsi, PO & PS-Katkamdag, at present Dist-Hazaribagh. … … Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Imtiaz Khan, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : ------ 20/ 03rd July, 2026 1. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for 2026:JHHC:19477 Page | 2 restoration of S.A. No.95/2019 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance vide order dated 14.08.2019. 2. The delay was condoned earlier. 3. Though the name of the learned counsel for the respondents is appearing in this case but the learned counsel for the respondents has not appeared today. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no sooner the second appeal is restored to its original file, he will remove the defect(s). 5. Considering the submission made by the petitioner and the fact of this case, I am inclined to allow this C.M.P. 6. The Second Appeal being S.A. No.95/2019 is restored to its original file with a condition that the defect(s) will be removed within a period of four weeks, otherwise this order will not be given effect to. 7. Accordingly, this Civil Misc. Petition stands allowed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 03rd July, 2026 S.K.D./CP-2 Uploaded on 07.06.2026