Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1055 of 2026
------ Raja Baraik, S/o Mangru Baraik, R/o Soda Mandir Toli, PO and PS- Bano, District- Simdega, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
………..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………..
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, APP
------
Order No.02 / Dated : 09.03.2026.
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody in connection with Bano [Simdega] P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024 [POCSO Case No.07 of 2025] for the offence registered under 137(2) of the BNS, 2023, has prayed for regular bail.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the victim-girl and petitioner were known to each other. Further, the victim-girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 has specifically stated that there was no inducement and she had left her home on her own sweet-will.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that consent of a minor is inconsequential.
Under the circumstances, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded