Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1901 (JHR)

RAJA BARAIK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1055/2026 · 2026-03-09

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1055 of 2026 ------ Raja Baraik, S/o Mangru Baraik, R/o Soda Mandir Toli, PO and PS- Bano, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ……….. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ……….. For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, APP ------ Order No.02 / Dated : 09.03.2026. Heard both the sides. The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody in connection with Bano [Simdega] P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024 [POCSO Case No.07 of 2025] for the offence registered under 137(2) of the BNS, 2023, has prayed for regular bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the victim-girl and petitioner were known to each other. Further, the victim-girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 has specifically stated that there was no inducement and she had left her home on her own sweet-will. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that consent of a minor is inconsequential. Under the circumstances, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded