[2026:RJ-JP:3544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 258/2015 Rang Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Ganesh Lal Gurjar aged about 64 years, Resident of Village Udgaun, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Elementary Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Naruka for Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC with Mr. Saumil Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/01/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking directions against the respondents for making pay fixation of the petitioner as well as arrears of salary and other benefits also including benefit of State insurance and other retiral benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that on account of conviction of the petitioner by competent Criminal Court, whereby he was sentenced with life imprisonment, further modified by the Appellate Court as 10 years’ imprisonment, after conducting departmental inquiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan [2026:RJ-JP:3544] (2 of 2) [CW-258/2015] Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 petitioner has been dismissed from service w.e.f. 14.08.2002. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has deliberately suppressed the order dated 22.11.2023. Learned counsel submits that in view of the fact that the petitioner has been dismissed from service, he is not entitled for retiral benefits or the other benefits as claimed in the writ petition. 4. Order dated 22.11.2023, whereby petitioner has been dismissed from service after conducting disciplinary inquiry on account of being convicted in Criminal Court is taken on record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the order of dismissal and is also not in a position to extend any justification for not disclosing such fact in the writ petition. 6. In the light of above, there is no scope of interference in the instant writ petition, and same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /38