Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19005 (BOM)

DADASO KISAN SAWAT AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

ABA/569/2026 · 2026-10-13

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/3 60-ABA-569-2026(CR).DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 569 OF 2026 1. Dadaso Kisan Sawat 2. Kisan Bapu Sawat ….Applicants (Deleted as per order dt. 13/10/2026). VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ….Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Muralidhar Kharat, for Applicants. Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State. Officer: Mr. A. E. Chavan, Aatpadi Police Station, District Sangli, present. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 13th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Muralidhar Kharat, learned Advocate for the Applicants, and Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State. 2. Mr. Muralidhar Kharat, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from Applicant No. 2 (Kisan Bapu Sawat), seeks leave to unconditionally withdraw this Anticipatory Bail Application filed in connection with Crime No. 297 of 2026 on behalf of Applicant No.2. Shantanu S. Dhudum SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2026.10.13 21:31:26 +0530 2/3 60-ABA-569-2026(CR).DOC 3. This request is not opposed by Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Muralidhar Kharat, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw this Application on behalf of Applicant No. 2 (Kisan Bapu Sawat). 5. Accordingly, the Application filed by Applicant No. 2 (Kisan Bapu Sawat) stands dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Mr. Muralidhar Kharat, learned Advocate for the Applicants, seeks permission to carry out an amendment to delete the name of Applicant No. 2 (Kisan Bapu Sawat). Permission is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 7. Upon deletion of the name of Applicant No. 2 (Kisan Bapu Sawat), Dadaso Kisan Sawat shall be the sole Applicant. 8. By the present Application, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”), the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 297 of 2026, registered at Atapadi Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 119(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNS”). 9. Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer of Atapadi Shantanu S. Dhudum 3/3 60-ABA-569-2026(CR).DOC Police Station, District Sangli, states that the custodial interrogation of the Applicant (Dadaso Kisan Sawat) is not required in connection with Crime No. 297 of 2026. 10. Based on the statement made by Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State, that the custodial interrogation of the Applicant (Dadaso Kisan Sawat) in Crime No.297 of 2026 is not required, the apprehension of the Applicant stands allayed. 11. In view of the statement made by Ms. Shubhangi N. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State, this Application is disposed of. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum