Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19003 (AP)

Guttapati Chinna Kasaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7133/2026 · 2026-03-12

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010132142026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7133/2026 Between: 1. GUTTAPATI CHINNA KASAIAH,, S/O. PEDDAKASAIAH, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. UMMAREDDYPALLE VILLAGE TARLUPADU MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPADU, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MARKAPUR DISTRICT AT MARKAPUR-523316. 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, MARKAPUR DIVISION, MARKAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, TARLUPADU MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his agricultural lands to an extent of Ac. 1-28 cents in Sy.No.77/8, respectively situated at Nagellamudupu Village and Grampanchayat, Tarlupadu Mandal, Markapur 2 BKM,J W.P.No.7133 of 2026 District, without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the petitioner agricultural land to an extent of Ac. 1-28 cents in Sy.No.77/8 situated at Nagellamudupu Village and Grampanchayat, Tarlupadu Mandal, Markapur District, except in accordance with law, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner from his agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1- 28 cents in Sy.No.77/8situated at Nagellamudupu Village and Grampanchayat, Tarlupadu Mandal, Markapur District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.7133 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the agricultural lands to the extent of Ac.1.28 cents in Sy.No.77/8 situated at Nagellamudupu Village and Grampanchayat Tarlupadu Mandal, Markapur District without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 12.03.2026 submits that as the subject land is classified as patta land, there is no interest for the Revenue Department to evict the petitioner from the agricultural land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, recording the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 12.03.2026, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The said written instructions shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.7133 of 2026 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 13.03.2026 PGT