APHC010132452026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 7947/2026 Between: 1. VARANASI SANTHI,, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. GUNTURU VENKATA SATYA SUBRAHMANYAM, FORMER BRANCH MANAGER, GUNTUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., NALLAPADU BRANCH, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR-522 005 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CO- OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, BLOCK NO.4, GROUND FLOOR. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 238 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR-522 004 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, GUNTUR-522 004 4. K V RAMA RAO, DIVISIONAL CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, TENALI / THE SECTION 51 INQUIRY OFFICER, GDCC BANK LTD., NALLAPADU BRANCH, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR- 522 005 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in implicating the petitioner under Item No.2-A (SHG under DRDA) relating to Vengalayapalem for one CC loan at Serial No.1 and Item No.2- B (SHG under MEPMA), relating to CR Nagar, Guntur for four CC loans, in the Section 51 Inquiry in RC No.987/2024- DR, dated.09-10-2025, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.869/2024- C1, dated 14-11-2025, insofar as the petitioner is concerned. Further to direct the Respondents to delete the name of the petitioner from Item N0.2-A (SHG under DRDA) relating to the alleged amount of Rs.66,848/- and from Item N0.2-B (SHG under MEPMA) relating to the alleged amount of Rs.14.28 lakhs, IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Section 51 inquiry report, including disciplinary proceedings, recovery proceedings and attachment actions in RC No.869/2024-C1, dated.14- 11-2025, against the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr.MALLADI KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.7947 of 2026 ORDER: 1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a request to grant liberty to the Writ Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition on any subsequent cause of action. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition on any subsequent cause of action. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 31.03.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 3 WRIT PETITION No.7947 of 2026 Dated: 31.03.2026 chs