Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1900 (AP)

Mullapudi Padma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13977/2026 · 2026-05-07

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010267402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13977/2026 Between: 1. MULLAPUDI PADMA,, W/O SATYANARAYANA, AGE 57 YRS, RIO D.NO.2-160, OPP. POST OFFICE, NIMMALAGUDEM, BUTTAIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 534448. 2. CHERUKURI MANGAMANI,, W/O SRI RAMA MURTHY, AGE 55 YRS, R/O D.NO.4-114/3, MAIN ROAD, NEAR WATER TANK, VEDULAPALLI, MUNIKUDALI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 533230. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN 522239. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 533103. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 533125. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, THALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, PIN 534341 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more 2 particularly one in /the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declare the action of the respondent in not considering the application filed by the petitioners for grant of permission to remove the sand in Sy.No.164 of an f extent of Ac 17.45 cts and Sy.No.170 an extent of Ac 15.00 cts situated at Prakkilanka Village, Thallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of AP Mines and Minerals, Consession Rules 1966 and consequentially direct the respondents to consider the application filed by the petitioners on 18-01-2025 for grant of permission to remove the sand from the agriculture land covered in Sy.No.164 of an extent of Ac 17.45 cts and Sy.No.170 an extent of Ac 15.00 cts situated at Prakkilanka Village, Thallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District for the purpose of cultivation IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application filed by the petitioners on18-01-2025 for decasting of sand from the agriculture land in Sy.No.164 of an extent of Ac 17.45 cts and Sy.No.170 an extent of Ac 15.00 cts situated at Prakkilanka Village, Thallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13977 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the application filed by the petitioners for grant of permission to remove the sand in Sy.No.164 of an f extent of Ac 17.45 cts and Sy.No.170 an extent of Ac 15.00 cts situated at Prakkilanka Village, Thallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of AP Mines and Minerals, Consession Rules 1966 and consequentially direct the respondents to consider the application filed by the petitioners on 18-01-2025 for grant of permission to remove the sand from the agriculture land covered in Sy.No.164 of an extent of Ac 17.45 cts and Sy.No.170 an extent of Ac 15.00 cts situated at Prakkilanka Village, Thallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District for the purpose of cultivation and pass such other order or orders …” 2. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer to the limited extent of directing 4th respondent 4 to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 18.01.2025 in a time-bound manner. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the 4th respondent will consider the petitioners’ representation dated 18.01.2025, in accordance with the law. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel on both sides, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 18.01.2025, and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 08.05.2026 PSA