[2026:JHHC:19742] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6214 of 2026 ------ Binod Kumar Singh @ Binod Singh, aged about 64 years, Son of Late Bageshwari Prasad Singh, resident of village- Gokhana, P.S.- Hunterganj, P.O.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra; presently residing at Sankat Mochan Nagar, Near Maharana Pratap Chowk, Sacred Heart School, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O.- Jhumritelaiya, P.S.- Telaiya, District- Koderma/Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. B. M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Ms. Nutan Kri. Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Deo, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.140 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 61 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of Udit Raj. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that neither the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor is there any eye-witness to the occurrence but only because he is the director of the school, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.140 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.07.2026-Animesh/