Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18992 (JHR)

SUJIT KUMAR @ SUJIT KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6215/2026 · 2026-07-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19731] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6215 of 2026 ------ Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Yadav aged about 21 year, son of late Bijay Yadav resident of village- Singho, P.O.- Gumgi, P.S.- Tisri, District- Giridih, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-06-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.46 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 118 (2), 109 (1), 351 (3), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and his father by causing injuries to them with beer bottle, knife, iron rod, throwing bricks and stones. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the specific allegation of causing injury on the head of the informant with beer bottle is against the co-accused Bhola Yadav who has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.5739 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No.46 of 2026 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.07.2026-Animesh/