Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:34159
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1332
of 2026
Decided on: 13
th August, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the direction given by this Court in the judgment sought to be executed, the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Chamba, Forest Division, Chamba, has passed an order on 03.06.2025, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected.
2. As per the judgment dated 23.04.2025, passed in CWP No.6309 of 2025, titled, Ashok Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, the petition was disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to 6le representation before the competent authority 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 within a period of two weeks for redressal of his grievance, which in-turn, shall be decided by the competent authority, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six weeks.
3. Since the mandate contained in the aforementioned
judgment has been complied with and the representation made by the petitioner has been considered and rejected, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in case he is aggrieved by the order dated 03.06.2025, passed by the competent authority.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 13 th August, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge