Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1899 (RAJ)

NIRMAL ALIAS DILKHUSH S/O RAMESHWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2916/2026 · 2026-03-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2916/2026 1. Nirmal Alias Dilkhush S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Jharoda, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At District Jail, Karauli). 2. Smt. Anita W/o Rameshwar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jharoda, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Mahila Bandi Sudhar Grah, Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Shukla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.362/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli for offences under Sections 121(1), 132, 261 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners being the son and wife of Rameshwar have been implicated on allegations that they obstructed and caused injuries to public servants while they were discharging their official duties [2026:RJ-JP:12832] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2916/2026] in pursuance of arrest of Rameshwar. It is submitted that one of the petitioners is a young person of tender age and the other petitioner Anita is a woman are behind the bars since 31.01.2026 without any criminal past. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Nirmal Alias Dilkhush S/o Rameshwar & Smt. Anita W/o Rameshwar, shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/51