2026:JHHC:19129 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3984 of 2026 --------- Sushil Kumar Chaudhary, aged about 86 years, son of Late Kailash Chaudhary, resident of Panki Road, Rerma, P.O.-Daltonganj, P.S. Medni Nagar, District-Palamau; ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Ranchi University, Ranchi, through its Vice Chancellor, P.O.- Ranchi GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi; 2. Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University, Ranchi, P.O.-Ranchi GPO, P.S.- Kotwali, District-Ranchi; 3. Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi, through its Vice Chancellor, P.O.-Ranchi GPO, P.S.- Kotwali, District-Ranchi; ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : M/s. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Amit Kumar Sinha, Manish Kumar, Advocates --------- 02/Dated: 30.06.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: For issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to re-determine the pension on the basis of recommendation of the 7th Pay Revision Committee by removing the anomalies and to pay pension amount with interest @ 10% per annum and within a specified period; And/Or For issuance of any such Writ/Order/Direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and for doing conscionable justice to the Petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; however, in spite of repeated representations the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation, who shall look into the matter so 2026:JHHC:19129 2 that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.3 and the respondent No.3 upon receipt of the same after verification of record will forward the claim within a period of 6 weeks to the respondent No.2, who in turn shall decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with applicable rules and regulations within a further period of 4 weeks. If the decision is in favour of the petitioner, the consequential monetary benefits shall be paid to him within a further period of 4 weeks. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant writ application stands disposed of. Pending I.A., if any also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JUNE 30, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 07/07/2026