DEEPAK SINHGAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
W.P.(C)/13940/2026 · 2026-09-21
Saurabh Banerjee
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18982 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18982 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010452642026 + W.P.(C) 13940/2026
DEEPAK SINHGAL
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Varun Mehlawat Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Standing Counsel for MCD and Mr. Amaan Khan, Adv. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
21.09.2026
The present petition has been received on urgent mentioning. As such, the same is taken up for hearing. CM.APPL.65126/2026 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 13940/2026, CM.APPL.65125/2026
3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the show cause notice dated 28.08.2026 issued under Section 344(1) and 343 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (DMC Act) and another Show Cause Notice dated 09.09.2026 issued under Section 345-A of the DMC Act in respect of the property bearing no. Shop No. 9, E-Block, DDA Market, LSC, MASJID Moth, G.K.-III, New Delhi (subject This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:15:23
property). 4. Mr. Sistani, counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has duly replied to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice on
17.09.2026. He further submits that in view of the present position as on date, the petitioner apprehends that demolition/ sealing action will be carried out by the respondent/ MCD (MCD) despite the fact that no Sealing Order or Demolition Order has been passed as yet. 5. Mr. Nath, counsel for the MCD, upon instructions, submits that since neither the Sealing Order nor the Demolition Order has been issued by the MCD till now, the writ petition is way premature as on date. He further submits that the steps which are being taken are only with respect to the encroached areas. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. Needless to state, the MCD shall proceed in accordance with law, after granting a personal hearing to the petitioner and/ or calling for further documents, if any, from the petitioner before adjudicating on the same finally on merits, and/ or without being influenced with the observations made by this Court herein. 8.
In case of a final disposal thereof by the MCD, against which the petitioner is aggrieved, the petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026/rr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:15:23