Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18981 (CHH)

HEMRAI SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2408/2026 · 2026-05-12

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22474 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2408 of 2026 1 - Hemrai Sahu S/o Shri Dhanukram Sahu Aged About 48 Years Occupation In Charge, Society Manager, Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti, Gaurela, Registration No. 3078, R/o Village Gaurela, Tahsil Pendra Road, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Registrar Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Society Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Managing Director C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, Chhattisgarh, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Marketing Officer C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Fedration, Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 6 - Asstt. Commissioner/asstt. Registrar Co-Operative Society, Gaurela, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Nodal Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank Limited, Pendra, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Managing Director Apex Bank Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer For MARK-FED : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For Resp. No. 7 and 8 : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. S. S. Baghel, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondent - MARK-FED submits that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous as entire paddy has been lifetd. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent - MARK-FED, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge