Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1898 (BOM)

SHAHID SHARIFF BAGWAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/232/2026 · 2026-07-27

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28-BA-232-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2026 Shahid Shariff Bagwan … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent __________________________________________________________ Mr. Tejas Kamble a/w Sushant Tayade, Pallavi Valvi, Sujit Padvi, Akshay Ade, for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. __________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 27th July, 2026. P.C. : 1. By the present Bail Application, the Applicant is seeking Bail in Crime No. 736 of 2023 which is registered as Sessions Case No. 652 of 2026, which is pending before the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi, Shirur. 2. Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that subsequent to the order dated 09.07.2025, there has been change in circumstances. He submits that the Applicant, on the grounds of change in circumstances and other legal grounds available to the Applicant, in regards of his detention, on Arjun 1 28-BA-232-2026.doc instructions from the Applicant, intends to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court. He submits that such Bail Application would be filed within a period of one (1) week from today. He therefore requests that a direction be issued to the Trial Court to consider such Bail Application expeditiously. 3. Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent – State, does not oppose the request made by Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant. 4. In view of the above, Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court on the grounds of change in circumstances and other legal grounds available to him. 5. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court within a period of 10 days from today, then, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi, is requested to make an endeavor to decide the said Bail Application expeditiously on its own merits and in accordance with law and at any rate within a period of 2 Arjun 2 28-BA-232-2026.doc months from the first date of hearing in the matter. 6. Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that the Applicant shall not seek adjournments on the dates when the Bail Application is fixed before the Trial Court. 7. Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP, states that prosecution would co-operate with the early disposal of the Bail Application. 8. In view of the above, the Bail Application No. 232 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 3 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.07.28 21:32:38 +0530