2026:JHHC:19295 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. M. P. No. 31 of 2026 …. Ajay Kumar Sharma, aged about 54 years, son of Late Shambhu Prasad Sharma @ Shambhu Prasad Pujari, resident of 53, Ghat Road, Sahibganj, PO & PS- Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi, PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist. -Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, PO & PS- Sahibganj, Dist.- Sahibganj 4. The LRDC, Sahibganj PO & PS- Sahibganj, Dist.- Sahibganj 5. The Circle Officer, Sahibganj, PO & PS- Sahibganj, Dist.- Sahibganj 6. The Circle Inspector, Sahibganj, PO & PS- Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj 7. The Circle Karumchari, office of Circle Officer, Sahibganj, PO & PS- Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj 8. Sangita Devi, wife of Late Vinay Singh 9. Manoj Kumar Singh, S/o Late Radha Kishun Singh 10. Sashi Devi, daughter of Late Radha Kishun Singh 11. Sunita Sinha, wife of Late Anil Kumar Singh 12. JaiPrakash Singh, Son of Late Mohan Lal Singh. 13. Rajesh Kumar Singh, son of Late Rama Narayan Singh 14. Ajay Kumar Singh, son of Late Rama Narayan Singh. All Sl. Nos. 8 to 14 are residents of Village- Kakaroitya Bazar, Sobhanpur Ganga Prasad, PO & PS- Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj …… Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Baibhav Gahlaut, AC to Senior AAG ….. 04/01.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The instant C. M. P. No. 31 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for restoration of W. P. (C) filing No. 956 of 2025, which stood dismissed on 09.12.2025 due 2026:JHHC:19295 -2- to non-compliance of the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by this Court. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to inadvertence, he could not appear on 18.11.2025 as he could not mark the cause list of the instant case and as such, he was not aware of the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by this Court in W. P. (C) filing No. 956 of 2025. It is submitted that the order could not complied due to mistake and the petitioner will remain careful in future and hence, C.M.P. No. 31 of 2026 may be allowed and W. P. (C) filing No. 956 of 2025 may be restored to its original file. 4. No objection raised by the learned counsel for the State. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the averment made in para-4, 5 and 6 of the CMP, the present C. M. P. No. 31 of 2026 is allowed and W. P. (C) filing No. 956 of 2025 is restored to its original file. 6. Office is directed to place this case before the Appropriate Bench as per roster. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 01.07.2026 Kamlesh/