Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18973 (CHH)

MIRZA SALIM BAIG (DEAD) THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEIR RABIYA KHATUN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4022/2026 · 2026-05-10

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21914 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4022 of 2026 1 - Mirza Salim Baig (Dead) Through Its Legal Heir Rabiya Khatun W/o Late Mirza Salim Baig Aged About 45 Years R/o Karan Nagar, New, Changorabhata Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mannu Lal Yadav (Dead) Through Its Legal Heir Jayanti Bai Yadav W/o Late Mannulal Yadav Aged About 46 Years R/o H.No. 14, Ward No. 29, B.T.I. Road, Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Sarju Ram Netam (Dead) Through Its Legal Heir Maina Bai W/o Late Sarju Ram Netam Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 17, Khairkheda, Distt.- Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tulesh Kumar Sahu (Dead) Through Its Legal Heir Mithleh Sahu W/o Late Tulesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Boriya Kala, Sejbahar, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Dukhit Ram Pal (Dead) Through Its Legal Heir Kanti Bai Pal W/o Late Dukhit Ram Pal Aged About 48 Years R/o H.No. 12, Ward No. 20, Vill. Pirda, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.05.12 10:13:22 +0530 2 6 - Amar Singh Sahu S/o Late Shivdayal Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o Ward No. 50, Tikrapara, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Kanval Ram Pal S/o Late Ramlal Pal Aged About 71 Years R/o Paras Nagar, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Jagdish Ram Sahu S/o Late Dukhit Ram Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Vill. Biroda, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Naresh Kumar Sahu S/o Punit Ram Sahu Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Bajrang Chowk, Abhanpur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Nandkumar Sahu S/o Rahuaram Sahu Aged About 63 Years R/o New Purena, Telibandha, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary General Administration Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 3 - The Secretary Public Works Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Secretary Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department (Building And Road), Kanker Division, District- Uttar Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Division No. 1 District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Division Baloda-Bazar District- Baloda-Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate appearing through Video Conferencing For Respondent(s) : Shri Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 11.05.2026 1. The limited relief that the Petitioners seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to the 4 Respondents for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioners, they have made their respective claim in the light of the recent decision of this Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands afÏrmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed person in the light of the aforesaid decision of this Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib