Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18967 (BOM)

BALBHIM LIMBAJI TARDE AND OTHERS v. VANARSHI ALIAS VANMALA ASHOK GAVALI

CA/11886/2026 · 2026-10-12

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 85.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 85 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11886 OF 2026 IN SAST/6066/2026 BALBHIM LIMBAJI TARDE AND OTHERS VERSUS VANARSHI ALIAS VANMALA ASHOK GAVALI ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Prashant Babruwan Jadhav. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 12th October, 2026. P.C.: 1 This is an application for restoration of the appeal, which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections. 2 Perused the application. There is delay of 161 days caused in filing this application. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice, as the delay is not caused deliberately and intentionally. Hence, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C), subject to the removal of office objections within two weeks from today. 4 It is clarified that if the office objections are not removed within the stipulated time, this application shall be deemed to be rejected without further reference to the Court. 5 List the second appeal on 26th October, 2026. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga 2026:BHC-AUG:48487