Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18966 (RAJ)

SHIV KUMAR CHANDAK, SON OF SHRI GOURI SHANKAR CHANDAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6790/2024 · 2026-01-22

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3018] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 485/2024 Liladhar Shyamsunderlal Chandak S/o Late Shri Shyamsunder Lal Chandak, Aged About 78 Years, R/o B-401, Harcules, Link Road, Vasant Galaxy, Bangur Nagar, Goregaon (West) Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400104. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Umashankar Vyas S/o Shri Nawal Kishore Vyas, R/o Mavlo Ki Gali, Chhota Bazar, Sambharlake, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6790/2024 1. Shiv Kumar Chandak, Son Of Shri Gouri Shankar Chandak, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of 2001 Polaris Vasant Galaxy, Bangur Nagar, Goregaon West, Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra Pin 400104. 2. Pankaj Chandak, Son Of Liladhar Chandak, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of B-501 Hercules, Vasant Galaxy, Bangur Nagar, Goregaon West Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra Pin Code-400104. 3. Neeraj Chandak, Son Of Shri Kailash Chand Chandak, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Tower No. 2/1501, Rustomjee Ozone, Goregaon, Mulund Link Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra Pin Code-400104. 4. Shree Gopal Chandak Son Of Son Of Shri Ram Awtar Chandak, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of 265 Block B, Bangur Avenue, Dum Dum, Kolkata Pin Code- 700055. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Uma Shankar Vyas Son Of Shri Nawal Kishore Vyas, Resident Of Malvo Ki Gali, Chhota Bazar, Sambharlake, District Jaipur. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:3018] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-485/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Alankrita Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Poonam Chand Bhandari with Mr. Dinesh Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 22/01/2026 1. SBCRLMA No. 485/2024 is filed for granting exemption from personal appearance to the accused-applicant before the Investigating Authority and allow him to appear through counsel, alternatively grant him extension of time whereas, SBCRLMP No. 6790/2024 is filed for quashing of FIR No.95/2024 registered at the Police Station Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC and no further proceedings in the said FIR be undertaken qua the petitioner. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent have categorically submitted that the negative Final Report (FR) has already been filed as the dispute inter se the parties registered under the said FIR was purely of civil nature. 3. Heard. 4. Considering the fact that nothing survives in the present application and petition, the same are dismissed as rendered infructuous. 5. Additionally, it is made clear that on account of subsequent developments, the applicants/petitioners will be at liberty to approach appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if need so arises. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-163-164