1 2026:HHC:32803 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 422 of 2026 Decided on: 5.8.2026 Ramesh Chand … Petitioner Versus Sachin …Respondent _____________________________ ______________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ___________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal and Ms. Sukriti Panwar, Advocates. For the Respondents : None Virender Singh, Judge (oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 10.3.2026, passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Amb, District Una, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the First Appellate Court’), in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 21 of 2025, whereby the learned First Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner, which he had preferred against the order dated 19.4.2025, passed by the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No. 1, Amb, District 2 2026:HHC:32803 Una, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’) in CMA No.60-VI-25, filed in Civil Suit No. 145-1-2023. 2. The learned trial Court, vide order dated 19.4.2025 has dismissed the application, filed by the petitioner, under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, with a prayer to permit the petitioner to renovate his already constructed house, as the learned trial Court has passed the order to maintain status quo, qua the nature, possession and construction upon the suit land. 3. In the application, filed under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, a prayer has been made by the petitioner, who has been impleaded in the lis, before the learned trial Court, as defendant No. 1, to permit him to do plastering and flooring work (renovation) of the already constructed house. 4. The learned trial Court, while deciding application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, had directed the parties to maintain status quo, qua the nature, possession and construction upon the suit land. 5. Considering the above facts, the present petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to 3 2026:HHC:32803 carry out renovation work in the already constructed house with the rider that he will not seek any equity, in case, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed by the learned trial Court. In other words, the renovation work (plastering and flooring work) whatsoever carried by the petitioner, shall be subject to the final outcome of the Civil suit, pending adjudication before the learned trial Court. 5. With these observations, the petition is accordingly disposed of. The pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. (Virender Singh) 5.8.2026 Judge Kalpana