Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1896 (RAJ)

ASHEEN S/O LALA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1445/2026 · 2026-03-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1445/2026 Asheen S/o Lala, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Sahar, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli. (At Present, Confined At District Jail, Hin- daun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Anees For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Krishna Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Sec- tion 483 of BNSS in FIR No.304/2025 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2) and 115(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Pros- ecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both parties are residents of the same locality and are neighbours. He submits that an amicable compromise has been reached be- tween the parties. In support of his contentions, he has filed a copy of the compromise. Petitioner is behind the bars since [2026:RJ-JP:12791] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1445/2026] 03.12.2025 without any criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has conceded to the ar- guments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and has submitted that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He has further stated that he has no objection to the grant of bail to the present petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material avail- able on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/ demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Asheen S/o Lala, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subse- quent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/41