NASREENA AKHTER AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME)
WP(C)/1566/2026 · 2026-07-14
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1896 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1896 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No.1566/2026 CM No.4074/2026
NASREENA AKHTER AND ANOTHER
…..Petitioners
Through: Mr. Asif Nabi, Advocate
Vs
UNION TERRITORY OF J& K AND OTHERS
.…. Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (14.07.2026)
01. The petitioners have not reported themselves, although they are seeking protection order from this Court by reference to their matrimonial life being objected to by the private respondents.
02. This is the second date of hearing in this case and
learned counsel for the petitioners is seeking grant of adjournment in such like case which is nothing but mockery of the proceedings. Either the petitioners are not under any state of alleged threat or apprehension from the end of the private respondents or they do not intend to come before this Court for making their statements in support of the allegations made. Sr. No.3 Regular Cause List
2
03. In the light of the aforesaid omission on the part of the writ petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to right of the petitioners to approach this Court again if any threat perception comes to attend upon them from the end of the respondents No.6 to 13 or any one of them as the case may be.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR
14.07.2026
“Opinder”