Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18958 (AP)

BHASKAR REDDY v. V SRINIVASULU

CRP/866/2026 · 2026-03-23

Ninala Jayasurya

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010129382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION N Between: Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. J. Employee, R/o. D.N0.28 Chittoor AND 1. V.Srinivasulu, S/o. V.Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ Employee, R/o. D.No Colony, Chittoor. 2. Saritha, W/o. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. D.N0.28 Colony, Chittoor. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of In the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, be pleased to permit the petitioner to Petition against the Orders dated O.S. No.263 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Excise, Chittoor. I.A. No.1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fi be pleased to stay all further Proceedings in the Suit Vide O.S. No.263 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class Chittoor pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.866 OF 2026 Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. J.Venkata Reddy, Aged about 67 years, Occ Employee, R/o. D.N0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, AND , S/o. V.Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ R/o. D.No.28-394/2B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor. Saritha, W/o. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. D.N0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor. ...Respondents Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may permit the petitioner to file the present Civil Revision against the Orders dated 19.01.2026 in I.A. No.100 of 2024 in on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) cum Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may tay all further Proceedings in the Suit Vide O.S. No.263 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class Chittoor pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.Harinath Reddy Soma Counsel for the Respondents: --- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Venkata Reddy, Aged about 67 years, Occ 394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, ...Petitioner , S/o. V.Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ 394/2B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Saritha, W/o. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ 394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar ...Respondents praying that in the High Court may the present Civil Revision 100 of 2024 in on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil um Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances led in support of the petition, the High Court may tay all further Proceedings in the Suit Vide O.S. No.263 of 2023 on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Excise, Mr.Harinath Reddy Soma 2 CRP_866_2026 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considered the submissions made and perused the order under revision. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to impress upon the Court that the power of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has to be invoked, in view of the order passed by the learned Trial Court, which constitutes failure to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it, this Court see no ground to interfere with the order under revision. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J March 24, 2026. vasu 3 CRP_866_2026 REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. V SRINIVASULU, S/o. V. Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ Employee, R/o. D.N0.28-394/2B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor. 2. Saritha, W/o. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. D.N0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor. 3. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies 4 CRP_866_2026 HIGH COURT DATED:24/03/2026 ORDER CRP NO. 866 OF 2026