[2026:RJ-JP:2472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9221/2017 Raghubiri Devi, W/o Late Shri Surendra Pal Singh, R/o G-16-A, Kamla Nagar, Meenawala, Near Bus Stand No. 21, Sirsi Road, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Inspector General Of Police Cid Intelligence Branch, Police Head Quarter Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police Cid Intelligence, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Sirohi For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to grant special family pension award to the petitioner as per rules. b) Any other relief or order or direction this Hon’ble High Court may deem fit and proper be also passed.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 20.03.2025 in Civil Appeal No.489/2018 titled as The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Ms. Madhu Bala submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court. He [2026:RJ-JP:2472] (2 of 2) [CW-9221/2017] further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid ratio. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Ms. Madhu Bala (supra) passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court affirming the judgement dated 01.08.2016 in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.591/2015 passed at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Ms. Madhu Bala Vs. State (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /135