1 APHC010128282019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 5624/2019 Between: 1. BHOOMI REDDY KUNTOLLA KRISHNAIAH,, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 10/82, BADVEL ROAD, MYDUKURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDUKURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYDUKURU POLICE STATION, MYDUKURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SRI MADDURU SUBBARAYUDU, MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. SRI GANDIKOTA SIVA KUMAR, R/O MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. SRI SHAREEF, MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not providing the police aid to the petitioner, who is facing life threat in the hands of the respondents 5 to 7 and their henchmen, as illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner, who is facing life threat in the hands of the respondents 5 to 7 and their henchmen, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.5624 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. 2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 24.03.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 5624 of 2019 Dated: 24.03.2026 TM