Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1895 (CAL)

REZWANUL HAQUE v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/194/2025 · 2026-01-15

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 15.01.2026 21 Saikat Mukherjee WPA(P)/194/2025 REZWANUL HAQUE VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. S.K. Mustafi Rahaman, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Arjun Ray Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. D. Mitra, Adv. …For the Respondent No.5/WBPCB Mr. Ayan Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Dhillon Sengupta, Adv. Ms. Shihini Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Saikat Mallick, Adv. …For the Respondent No.5 Ms. Saswati Manna, Adv. …For the Private Respondent Per, Sujoy Paul, J.:- 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this matter has become rendered infructuous and may be dismissed. 2. The other side has no objection. 3. The writ petition has been dismissed having rendered infructuous. 4. Interim order (if any) stands vacated. (SUJOY PAUL, ACJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)