Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18948 (CHH)

RADHESHYAM SAHU v. PRAKASH KUMAR BHARDWAJ

CONT/1816/2025 · 2026-05-10

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22115 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1816 of 2025 1 - Radheshyam Sahu S/o Shri Dukalha Ram Sahu Aged About 46 Years Office Bearer Of Maa Bhadrakali Khadya Suraksha Poshan And Upbhokta Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Pandrabhattha, Block-Bemetara, District-Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Ganeshwar Sahu S/o Shri Bhuvan Sahu Aged About 43 Years (Vice President), Office Bearer Of Maa Bhadrakali Khadya Suraksha Poshan And Upbhokta Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Pandrabhattha, Block-Bemetara, District-Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Mithlesh Sahu S/o Shri Bhuvan Sahu Aged About 40 Years (Secretary), Office Bearer Of Maa Bhadrakali Khadya Suraksha Poshan And Upbhokta Seva Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Pandrabhattha, Block-Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus Prakash Kumar Bhardwaj Aged About 42 Years Posted As Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.) .. Respondent(s) For Petitioners Shri Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocate For Respondent Ms Akanksha Singh, Advocate Order on Board By Bibhu Datta Guru, J. KONDAPALLI GOWRI SANKARA RAO Digitally signed by KONDAPALLI GOWRI SANKARA RAO Date: 2026.05.11 17:14:56 +0530 2 11 -5-2026 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for alleged defiance of the order dated 12-9-2025 passed by this Court in WPC No.5327 of 2024. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent by placing a copy of the order dated 8-1-2026 would submit that the order passed in WPC No.5327 of 2024 has already been complied with in its true perspective. Copy of the order dated 8-1-2026 is taken on record. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that albeit the order has been passed on 8-1-2026 but copy of the same has been produced by the respondent before this Court today for the first time that too without filing affidavit in support of the said order. 4. Be that as it may, since the order of this Court has been complied with by concluding the enquiry, the petitioners may question the legality and validity of the same before the appropriate forum, if so advised. 5. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of. 6. Rule is discharged. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri