Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18947 (KAR)

M/S VISHWAKARMA ENGINEERING WORKS v. H RAVIGOWDA

WP/18897/2025 · 2026-06-01

D K Singh, Rajesh Rai K

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25568-DB WP No. 18897 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 18897 OF 2025 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. M/S VISHWAKARMA ENGINEERING WORKS REPRESENTED BY IT MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. RAJESH SHARMA AGED 32 YEARS OCCUPATION, BUSINESS R/O MIDC, PHASE-IV, PLOT NO.173, AKOLA TQ AND DIST. AKOLA (MAHARASHTRA STATE) EMAIL. salesvishwakrmanx@gmail.com …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VIMALA C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H RAVIGOWDA PROP. OF NGR INDUSTRIES, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO.47-A TUBINAKERE INDUSTRIAL AREA, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TQ. AND DIST L MANDYA (KARNATAKA STATE) CONTACT NO.9986519873 EMAIL.RAVIGOWDAH.@GMAIL.COM …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25568-DB WP No. 18897 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION / ORDER AND FURTHER MAY PLEASE TO CALL THE RECORD AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE REVISION PETITION NO.1012/2021 (ANNEXURE NO.M) AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15/05/2025 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.59/2025 AND 18/03/2025 PASSED BY IN REVISION PETITION NO.1012/2025 BY THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION (ANNEXURE NOS. P AND N), ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 15.05.2025 passed in Review Petition No.59/2025 and the order dated 18.03.2025 passed in Revision Petition No.1012/2025 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, 'the NCDRC'). 2. The District Commission as well as the State Commission have concurrently held that the petitioner has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25568-DB WP No. 18897 of 2025 committed deficiency in service while supplying machinery to the respondent. The petitioner has raised the ground of jurisdiction for the first time before the NCDRC urging that the complainant/respondent did not qualify as a consumer as he purchased the machinery from the petitioner for commercial purposes. 3. The NCDRC has dealt with the orders passed by the District Commission as well as the State Commission quiet comprehensively and has dismissed the Revision Petition on the ground that concurrent findings of fact should not be interfered with. Further, the orders passed by the District Commission and the State Commission would suggest that the petitioner never raised the jurisdictional issue before the District Commission or the State Commission. We, therefore, find no error in the order passed by the NCDRC in Revision Petition as well as the Review Petition. As we find no merit in the petition, the writ petition is dismissed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25568-DB WP No. 18897 of 2025 4. The amount deposited by the petitioner before this Court to be remitted to the District Consumer Redressal Commission, Mandya in Execution Petition No.08/2021. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41