Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18946 (RAJ)

MANRAJ S/O DAYARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12535/2025 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12535/2025 1. Manraj S/o Dayaram, R/o Holaspura Thana Dablana District Bundi Rajasthan. 2. Devraj S/o Dayaram, R/o Holaspura Thana Dablana District Bundi Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.235/2025 registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 4. In the FIR, no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused-petitioners as regards any of the injury sustained by the complainant. [2026:RJ-JP:943] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12535/2025] 5. In the statement of the injured witness, namely, Manoj Kumar recorded under Section 180 BNSS, again there is no specific overt act was assigned to the accused-petitioners. 6. Having regard the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners and more particularly the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-petitioners either in the FIR or in the statement of the injured recorded under Section 180 BNSS, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioners named above in connection with FIR No.235/2025 registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /258